01-24-12, 06:06 PM | #34 |
BassFishin.Com Premier Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Huntsville, Al
Posts: 7,466
|
But even by looking at that fish in the pic, look at the belly.
That fish has something in its gut that is probably good for 2 or 3 pounds. Might be on bed. When so much of the record comes down to the simple question of whether or not a fish has eaten recently, or not yet spawned out her eggs, does that not lead somewhat to the conclusion that the weight of a fish being the thing that defines the particular greatness of a catch is somewhat arbitrary? -------------------- In baseball, do we still see the year Home Run record as a vital statistic? Or has the importance of the record itself been diminished, not just because of who currently holds it, but because of assumptions concerning all of the people who are near the top? Would it be better to just not care so much about how big a world record bass was, or who caught it? That is the direction I am starting to lean towards. I am starting to value the fight of the fish, and the totally subjective enjoyment that I personally get out of catching it, more than the objective weight.
__________________
Selling live waterdogs for less since 2005. |
Disclosure / Disclaimer
Before acting on the content posted, you should know that BassFishin.Com may benefit financially and otherwise from content, advertising, links or otherwise from anything you click on, read, or look at on our website. Click here to read our Disclosure Policy and Disclaimer. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|